Developing and Implementing a Risk Management FrameworkThe development and implementation of a Risk Management Framework (RMF) can assist in understanding the potential implications of selected options and evaluating between economic impacts and environmental and health benefits in deciding on fire protection initiatives. Quantitative risk assessment techniques may be used as part of an overall RMF or risk management strategy. RMF's are a description of an organization's specific set of functional activities and include associated definitions that specify the processes to be used to manage risks. Shortreed et al. provide a comprehensive description of RMF's, stating that:
The specific steps involved in developing a methodology include the following:
One of the primary objectives is to ensure a balance between the need to address any environmental, technical or economic issues with the need for compliance with regulatory, legislative and corporate requirements in each jurisdiction. There are several best practices to draw upon from other jurisdictions and organizations in the development of a RMF. The formulation of these into an organization's specific RMF methodology often results in a new and unique outcome and will require an understanding of both the technical issues and how to effectively implement such a framework within the organization. There are several approaches available, including the decision-making framework described in the CSA-Q850 Risk Management Standard (see CSA Q850 Risk Management Guidelines for details). Although a less formal approach may be adopted, the application of such a standard provides support and additional legitimacy for the decision making process. The specific steps involved are described in further detail below. Key Steps in the Risk Communcation ProcessInitiationTo confirm the objectives and scope of the project, potential stakeholders and the project schedule. Preliminary AnalysisThe preliminary analysis will consist of the development of an initial RMF tool, including an examination of relevant risk elements, weighting factors and criteria and recommendations for elements to be included in the model. Risk EstimationQuantitative risk assessment techniques may be used to provide further refinement of the risk estimation process and prioritization of mitigation strategies. Use of a risk ranking matrix (Figure 1) may be used to assess the relative severity of a potential incident.
Figure 1: Example risk ranking matrix Risk EvaluationRisk evaluation includes integrating cost information for the various options within the RMF and evaluating the efficacy of using the framework to assist in the decision making process. Risk ControlApplication on selected test or pilot projects, including an evaluation of acceptance of the application of the tool and acceptance of the results. Action / MonitoringImplementation of the selected risk management strategy and the establishment of a monitoring plan, including a process to identify issues associated with implementation, monitoring and compliance and development of a monitoring process or frame work to maintain this tool in-house.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc.jump to top of page ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||